Was Corey Crawford interfered with on key Predators’ goal? (Video)

Greg Wyshynski is really a author for Yahoo Sports. Contact him at puckdaddyblog@yahoo.com or find him on Twitter. His book, Bring Your EYE From The PUCK, can be obtained on Amazon . com and wherever books are offered.

So did the Blackhawks possess a situation here?

— Kevin Woodley (@KevinisInGoal) April 18, 2017

Watch Arvidsson in the finish of the play. He makes connection with Crawford, without a doubt. But he is not dealing with Crawford just like a freight train. He’s really attempting to spin back to an attacking position because the Predators rebound the puck.

MORE FROM YAHOO SPORTS

Here’s the aim:

When the referee’s position here’s that Arvidsson made contract outdoors the crease and “made an acceptable effort to prevent such contact,” that’s an acceptable conclusion here, and also the goal was properly counted.

Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville used his coach’s challenge.

Sorry but that is G interference each time Crawford there first + set, he’s titled to that particular space, not fair game because from blue ice https://t.co/A3pSwHVnc1

Forsberg’s shot experienced Crawford a moment after Viktor Arvidsson bumped the Blackhawks goalkeeper, who had been stationed just outdoors the top of the his crease. Arvidsson put his stick lower around the ice over Crawford’s, as well as made an appearance to bump the goalie’s mask.

Now, please, provide us with the number of hundred types of an objective such as this not permitted within the National hockey league. Because everyone knows they exist.

But others disagree:

The goalkeeper interference rule claims that goals ought to be disallowed if “an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate connection with a goalie, inside or outdoors of his goal crease.”

That stated, “Incidental connection with a goalie is going to be allowed, and resulting goals permitted, when such contact is initiated outdoors from the goal crease, provided the attacking player makes an acceptable effort to prevent such contact.”

Add Comment